SASECompare
Home/Comparisons/Post-Quantum Cryptography Readiness

Post-Quantum Cryptography Readiness

LIVE

Is the platform preparing for the post-quantum cryptography transition?

Gartner predicts current asymmetric cryptography will be unsafe by 2030. NIST finalized post-quantum standards in 2024. 'Harvest now, decrypt later' attacks make this urgent today. We tested 5 PQC readiness capabilities across all 8 SASE vendors.

5checks
8vendors
Information sourced from publicly available documentation. Vendor capabilities change frequently. Always verify with the vendor before making purchasing decisions. Not affiliated with any vendor. See our terms & disclaimer. Vendors: to report inaccuracies, email info@sasecompare.com.
Cato Networks
Cato

--

Check Point
Check Point

--

Cisco
Cisco

--

Cloudflare
Cloudflare

--

Fortinet
Fortinet

--

Netskope
Netskope

--

Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto

--

Zscaler
Zscaler

--

YESSupported
PARTIALLimited
NONot supported
TBDResearch pending
01

NIST-approved PQC algorithms supported?

02

Cryptographic agility roadmap?

03

Hybrid TLS (classical + PQC)?

04

Cryptographic algorithm inventory?

05

PQC traffic inspection capability?

Share
Did we get something wrong?Let us know

Need this analysis tailored to your environment?

Get a custom report with deeper analysis, weighted scoring based on your priorities, and vendor recommendations specific to your deployment.

Request Custom Report

Get notified when we publish new comparisons

No spam. Just new research drops and major updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Post-Quantum Cryptography Readiness comparison tested?
We test 5 specific scenarios across Cato Networks, Check Point, Cisco, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler. All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, and verified user reports. YES means confirmed working with documentation, PARTIAL means it works with significant limitations, NO means confirmed not supported.

Methodology

All answers are sourced from publicly available vendor documentation, knowledge base articles, press releases, and verified user reports. We do not rely on vendor marketing claims.

YES means the feature is confirmed working with documentation. PARTIAL means it works with significant caveats or limitations. NO means it is confirmed not supported. TBD means research is still in progress.

Click any cell in the matrix to see the detailed evidence and source link.

Feedback

Help me make this better

This is a one-person project. Your input directly shapes what gets added, fixed, or prioritized next.